Roger Goodell was
not shy in his punishment of the players allegedly involved in the New Orleans
Saints bounty scandal. The commissioner alleges that the team had a system in
place in which players and coaches contributed to a pool of money that was paid
out to players as a reward for injuring certain opponents. Current Packer
Anthony Hargrove received an eight game suspension for his alleged involvement.
He received the second longest suspension among players because he lied to
league officials during their investigation.
Hargrove is
currently appealing his suspension on the grounds that he was told to lie by
his coaches and team officials, and that he never participated in a ‘pay to
injure’ system of any kind. Hargrove’s appeal is heard and decided on by the
one and only Roger Goodell, the very person who meted out the suspensions in
the first place. This is asinine to say the least. Why even allow for an
appeals process if the arguments are not going to be heard by an impartial
third party? Where is Shyam Das when you need him (probably in Bud Selig's executive torture chamber in the bowels of Milwaukee's Lake Park Bistro)? It seems obvious that Goodell is taking a hard line on this issue
in order to protect the league against future financial consequences. The NFL
is not exactly being portrayed as concerned for the health of its players by
the NFLPA right now, as evidenced by the class action law suit and massive
media attention it is facing surrounding concussions. Goodell wants to send the
message that the league cares about player safety (I do not believe they do) and
that it will be proactive in making the game as safe as possible considering its
violent nature.
A
bounty system has no place in the NFL. It is against the rules and puts careers
and lives in danger unnecessarily. I believe two things about bounty systems;
players and coaches who are involved should be punished, and that their
existence is far more prevalent than anyone would like to admit. The Saints
have been made an example of, and that is fine, but there needs to be some sort
of checks and balances in the process to keep the commissioner in line. Goodell
has literally no reason to change his suspensions or even entertain the
arguments of those appealing to him. The only thing keeping Goodell in check at
any time is fear of retribution from the NFL owners, his employers. In handing
out harsh punishments in this particular case, Goodell has done the bidding of
the owners (again – his employers) in order to protect their long term
financial interest. It strikes me as rather hypocritical of Goodell to increase
Hargrove’s suspension based on the fact that the player simply carried out
orders given directly to him by his employers in order to protect their
financial interests.
With
regard to the eight game suspension, it will likely be upheld. It could be
reduced based on evidence, but the public would have no way to know if and when
that might happen, since the league is being at least reticent, if not
dishonest in sharing the actual evidence supporting their suspensions. A more likely possibility would be that the suspensions are
delayed, pending an ongoing legal battle (a la the Starcaps case of Kevin and
Pat Williams). This would prove to be extremely expensive for the players, and
the NFL (with its cavernous pockets) would likely come out on top. My suggestion
to Hargrove would be to take your lumps, make your opinion known, serve the
suspension, and come back with a chip on your shoulder the size of Roger
Goodell’s ego.
From
a Packer standpoint, the suspension is really not that bad. Yes we lose our
best free agent acquisition at a position of need for half the season, but
there are more than enough capable bodies to fill in for eight games. We signed
two other free agent defensive linemen (Philip Merling and former Packer Daniel
Muir) and drafted two more (Jerel Worthy and Mike Daniels). Defensive line is a
physically taxing position to say the least, and the line advantage often comes
down to who’s got more gas left in the tank in the fourth quarter. There are
worse things than a fresh set of motivated legs being injected into the
defensive line group for the stretch run to close out the season (and hopefully
beyond). The suspension allows Hargrove to be with the team, have full access
to the facilities, and participate fully in practices. There is no reason to
think that he won’t be both physically and mentally prepared once his opportunity
to play arrives.
Don’t
hold your breath for the NFL to fix their appellate system, since the owners no
doubt want to maintain total control. Goodell will continue to do their bidding
at every turn (with the occasional, inconsequential decision that goes the
players’ way for purely PR reasons), and he will do so to the tune of
approximately $20 million per year. Let’s be real, at that price, I can’t
really blame him. It is just football afterall.
Thanks for the great post. But I do have to ask, what makes you say that you don't believe the league cares about safety? Regardless of anything else they've done, or not done, the dramatic increase in fines and penalties for hits in the last few years is evidence enough for me that they do care. You could argue that maybe they don't care "enough", but certainly it's a step in that direction.
ReplyDeleteHey Ryan, thanks for the comment. You're right, the league has taken steps recently to help protect players. They could be doing this for all the right reasons, and they could genuinely care about player safety. To me, the recent rule changes are smell more like a reaction to the fire the NFL has come under in the past year or so. The changes allow the NFL to say to legislators, 'Hey look! We care! We saw there was a problem and we made rule changes! Don't rule in favor of the plaintiffs who say we don't care and want us to pay for their astronomical medical expenses!' Also, the new rules mainly protect quarterbacks and wide receivers. Along with the pass interference, illegal contact, and five yard chuck rules, the league has used these changes to encourage more passing, which equals more scoring, which equals more excitement and viewership from the fans, which equals more money. Again, I could totally be wrong, and maybe I'm just a pessimist, but that's just what it looks like to me.
ReplyDeleteIf you look at the rule changes as something to appease legislators, you might be right. Have they mandated use of the safer helmets yet, or is that still optional?
DeleteYou know last I heard, NFL teams do not even reveal what type of helmets their players use. Riddell is the 'official' helmet provider, but players can use whatever helmet they like, provided they scratch out the label. Gregg Easterbrook (my favorite football writer) wrote an interesting article about the Packers and Aaron Rodgers specifically when it comes to choice of helmet. Check it out if you like:
Deletehttp://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/110201_tuesday_morning_quarterback&sportCat=nfl